enforce retention policy on staging registries #8009
Labels
priority/important-soon
Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release.
sig/k8s-infra
Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG K8s Infra.
@upodroid mentioned he'd already announced that staging registries would have a 90d retention policy, some of them accumulated a LOT of content, and secondarily we're also seeing them used sometimes like "production" with end users being directed to (or choosing on their own) to pull directly from gcr.io/k8s-staging-foo even though these are meant to be project internal and do not give us flexibility to reroute load / costs unlike registry.k8s.io
This issue tracks rollout to any remaining projects, AIUI the projects with the most data had a policy enabled but not all of them yet.
/sig k8s-infra
/priority important-soon
/assign @upodroid
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: