[Codegen][JVM]: Name value class field to this in LVT
#5430
+29
−2
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
^KT-73995 fixed
scaventz
force-pushed
the
KT-73995-bad-name
branch
from
15451d4 to
c043686
Compare
|
I'm not sure if using a local variable name that is a Java keyword is fine. There must be a reason we use |
zhelenskiy
requested changes
Apr 14, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I agree with @udalov, we need some mangled name instead. Also, add a test for multi-field value classes, please.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
^KT-73995 fixed