Skip to content

(slow) operations tracker #3970

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

(slow) operations tracker #3970

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

joaquimg
Copy link
Member

@joaquimg joaquimg commented Apr 1, 2025

This adds the optional ability to mark all places where slow operations that allocate expression occur. Keeping the stack might be a lot of data, but it is a way to properly identify the issues instead of erroring one by one.

Possible additional functionality:
1 - also mark the operation type. A bit redundant with the stack, but might lead to summary reports.
2 - create a user friendly summary

TODO

  • add tests
  • add docs session, to be referenced in the performance issues.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 1, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 65.41353% with 46 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 99.25%. Comparing base (57132d8) to head (bd416ee).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/operators.jl 65.41% 46 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##            master    #3970      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   100.00%   99.25%   -0.75%     
===========================================
  Files           43       43              
  Lines         6076     6207     +131     
===========================================
+ Hits          6076     6161      +85     
- Misses           0       46      +46     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant