Create Nikhil_Insurance claim #100
Conversation
WalkthroughA new Jupyter notebook has been added to implement an auto insurance claim processing workflow. The notebook outlines a series of steps: parsing claim documents, indexing policy data, generating vector-based queries, matching policy conditions through LLM reasoning, and producing structured recommendations. It defines several Pydantic-based data models and encapsulates the operations within a dedicated workflow class. Additionally, methods for claim parsing and document declaration retrieval are introduced, with error handling and event management integrated into the workflow. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant U as User/Application
participant W as AutoInsuranceWorkflow
participant P as Policy Index
participant L as LLM Service
U->>W: Submit claim file
W->>W: Parse claim document (parse_claim)
W->>P: Query policy documents (get_declarations_docs)
W->>L: Generate query & match conditions
L-->>W: Return policy recommendations
W->>U: Output structured claim decision
Poem
Tip ⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
Nikhil_Insurance claim (2)
33-34: Consider pinning your library versions.
While installing dependencies within the notebook is convenient for demos, relying on unpinned versions can lead to reproducibility issues and unexpected breakages if upstream packages introduce breaking changes or security fixes.- !pip install llama-index llama-index-indices-managed-llama-cloud llama-cloud llama-parse + !pip install \ + llama-index==0.6.23 \ + llama-index-indices-managed-llama-cloud==0.2.1 \ + llama-cloud==1.0.0 \ + llama-parse==0.3.2
86-94: Prefer a date/datetime type fordate_of_loss.
Currently,date_of_lossis declared as astr. Switching to a Pydanticdatetime(ordate) field can help validate properly formatted dates, reduce parsing errors, and ensure more robust date handling.class ClaimInfo(BaseModel): """Extracted Insurance claim information.""" claim_number: str policy_number: str claimant_name: str - date_of_loss: str + date_of_loss: datetime loss_description: str estimated_repair_cost: float vehicle_details: Optional[str] = None
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Nikhil_Insurance claim(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Nikhil_Insurance claim (1)
186-193: Add error handling for JSON decode failures.
If the specified file is missing or the JSON is malformed,json.load()will raise an unhandled exception. Consider wrapping with try-except and providing a clearer error message or fallback.def parse_claim(file_path: str) -> ClaimInfo: with open(file_path, "r") as f: - data = json.load(f) + try: + data = json.load(f) + except json.JSONDecodeError as e: + raise ValueError(f"Error decoding JSON from {file_path}: {e}") return ClaimInfo.model_validate(data)
| "def parse_claim(file_path: str) -> ClaimInfo:\n", | ||
| " import json\n", | ||
| " with open(file_path, \"r\") as f:\n", | ||
| " data = json.load(f)\n", | ||
| " return ClaimInfo.model_validate(data) # replace \"ClaimInfo\".model_validate with actual ClaimInfo class method\n", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid duplicating parse_claim logic.
This parse_claim definition appears to replicate the earlier implementation at lines 186-193. Consolidate them into a single shared function to prevent divergence or maintenance overhead.
- def parse_claim(file_path: str) -> ClaimInfo:
- import json
- with open(file_path, "r") as f:
- data = json.load(f)
- return ClaimInfo.model_validate(data)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "def parse_claim(file_path: str) -> ClaimInfo:\n", | |
| " import json\n", | |
| " with open(file_path, \"r\") as f:\n", | |
| " data = json.load(f)\n", | |
| " return ClaimInfo.model_validate(data) # replace \"ClaimInfo\".model_validate with actual ClaimInfo class method\n", |
| " rec = ev.recommendation\n", | ||
| " covered = \"covered\" in rec.recommendation_summary.lower() or (rec.settlement_amount is not None and rec.settlement_amount > 0)\n", | ||
| " deductible = rec.deductible if rec.deductible is not None else 0.0\n", | ||
| " recommended_payout = rec.settlement_amount if rec.settlement_amount else 0.0\n", | ||
| " decision = ClaimDecision(\n", | ||
| " claim_number=claim_info.claim_number,\n", | ||
| " covered=covered,\n", | ||
| " deductible=deductible,\n", | ||
| " recommended_payout=recommended_payout,\n", | ||
| " notes=rec.recommendation_summary\n", | ||
| " )\n", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix coverage detection logic to avoid matching “not covered” as covered.
The substring check "covered" in rec.recommendation_summary.lower() will erroneously treat “not covered” as a positive match. This may lead to contradictions where coverage is marked True but settlement remains 0.0.
- covered = "covered" in rec.recommendation_summary.lower() or (rec.settlement_amount is not None and rec.settlement_amount > 0)
+ coverage_text = rec.recommendation_summary.lower()
+ has_coverage = " covered " in f" {coverage_text} "
+ is_exclusion = ("not covered" in coverage_text) or ("exclusion" in coverage_text)
+ covered = (rec.settlement_amount is not None and rec.settlement_amount > 0) or (has_coverage and not is_exclusion)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| " rec = ev.recommendation\n", | |
| " covered = \"covered\" in rec.recommendation_summary.lower() or (rec.settlement_amount is not None and rec.settlement_amount > 0)\n", | |
| " deductible = rec.deductible if rec.deductible is not None else 0.0\n", | |
| " recommended_payout = rec.settlement_amount if rec.settlement_amount else 0.0\n", | |
| " decision = ClaimDecision(\n", | |
| " claim_number=claim_info.claim_number,\n", | |
| " covered=covered,\n", | |
| " deductible=deductible,\n", | |
| " recommended_payout=recommended_payout,\n", | |
| " notes=rec.recommendation_summary\n", | |
| " )\n", | |
| " rec = ev.recommendation\n", | |
| " coverage_text = rec.recommendation_summary.lower()\n", | |
| " has_coverage = \" covered \" in f\" {coverage_text} \"\n", | |
| " is_exclusion = (\"not covered\" in coverage_text) or (\"exclusion\" in coverage_text)\n", | |
| " covered = (rec.settlement_amount is not None and rec.settlement_amount > 0) or (has_coverage and not is_exclusion)\n", | |
| " deductible = rec.deductible if rec.deductible is not None else 0.0\n", | |
| " recommended_payout = rec.settlement_amount if rec.settlement_amount else 0.0\n", | |
| " decision = ClaimDecision(\n", | |
| " claim_number=claim_info.claim_number,\n", | |
| " covered=covered,\n", | |
| " deductible=deductible,\n", | |
| " recommended_payout=recommended_payout,\n", | |
| " notes=rec.recommendation_summary\n", | |
| " )\n", |
Summary by CodeRabbit