Skip to content

PEP 779: Criteria for supported status for free-threaded Python initial draft #4301

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Mar 13, 2025

Conversation

Yhg1s
Copy link
Member

@Yhg1s Yhg1s commented Mar 13, 2025

Initial draft of PEP 779: Criteria for supported status for free-threaded Python.


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4301.org.readthedocs.build/

@Yhg1s Yhg1s requested a review from a team as a code owner March 13, 2025 00:36
@Yhg1s Yhg1s requested review from mpage and colesbury March 13, 2025 01:03
@Yhg1s Yhg1s merged commit 9d017fb into python:main Mar 13, 2025
5 checks passed
Sam Gross <colesbury at gmail.com>
Status: Draft
Type: Standards Track
Created: 03-Feb-2025
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is the date the PEP number was assigned:

Suggested change
Created: 03-Feb-2025
Created: 13-Mar-2025

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed in #4302

@@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
PEP: 779
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any reason not to use 776, the next in sequence?

Suggested change
PEP: 779
PEP: 776

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I saw 777 being used and 778 in the PRs, so I assumed 779 was the next one. Do you want me to renumber it?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's fine, you've already opened the discussion, we can fill the gap later.

777 was used out of sequence (re: #3786 (comment)).

Tip: this checks both published PEPs and pending PRs:

pip install pepotronpep next
Next available PEP: 776

@AA-Turner AA-Turner added the new-pep A new draft PEP submitted for initial review label Mar 13, 2025
@AA-Turner AA-Turner changed the title PEP 779: Criteria for supported status for free-threaded Python initial draft. PEP 779: Criteria for supported status for free-threaded Python initial draft Mar 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
new-pep A new draft PEP submitted for initial review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants