Fci l1c handle other coverage

[ClementLaplace]

This PR is dedicated to handle other coverages regarding the fci_l1c reader.

• Tests applied for the fci_l1c reader

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.19%. Comparing base (f15bd3b) to head (f8c8737).
Report is 40 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##             main    #3112    +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage   96.18%   96.19%            
========================================
  Files         391      393     +2     
  Lines       56633    56745   +112     
========================================
+ Hits        54471    54584   +113     
+ Misses       2162     2161     -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
behaviourtests	3.82% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
unittests	96.28% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 14594025837

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

• For more information on this, see Tracking coverage changes with pull request builds.
• To avoid this issue with future PRs, see these Recommended CI Configurations.
• For a quick fix, rebase this PR at GitHub. Your next report should be accurate.

Details

• 24 of 24 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 2 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage increased (+0.009%) to 96.295%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 14401317584:	0.009%
Covered Lines:	54839
Relevant Lines:	56949

---

💛 - Coveralls

[ameraner]

Hi Clement, thanks for this! Is there a reason why you haven't added the new fixture to the test test_count_in_repeat_cycle_rc_period_min here

satpy/satpy/tests/reader_tests/test_fci_l1c_nc.py

Line 1138 in a170b8e

def test_count_in_repeat_cycle_rc_period_min(self, reader_configs, fh_param, compare_tuples):

? It looks to me like that one is the most relevant test for this change, checking that the nominal time is computed correctly...

[ClementLaplace]

@ameraner you are right !! I have added the tests related to test_count_in_repeat_cycle_rc_period_min.

[ameraner]

LGTM, thanks!