Making FileUploadPropertyEditor more flexible

[PeterKvayt]

There is an existing issue for this PR: 18335

[github-actions]

Hi there @PeterKvayt, thank you for this contribution! 👍

While we wait for one of the Core Collaborators team to have a look at your work, we wanted to let you know about that we have a checklist for some of the things we will consider during review:

• It's clear what problem this is solving, there's a connected issue or a description of what the changes do and how to test them
• The automated tests all pass (see "Checks" tab on this PR)
• The level of security for this contribution is the same or improved
• The level of performance for this contribution is the same or improved
• Avoids creating breaking changes; note that behavioral changes might also be perceived as breaking
• If this is a new feature, Umbraco HQ provided guidance on the implementation beforehand
• 💡 The contribution looks original and the contributor is presumably allowed to share it

Don't worry if you got something wrong. We like to think of a pull request as the start of a conversation, we're happy to provide guidance on improving your contribution.

If you realize that you might want to make some changes then you can do that by adding new commits to the branch you created for this work and pushing new commits. They should then automatically show up as updates to this pull request.

Thanks, from your friendly Umbraco GitHub bot 🤖 🙂

[emmagarland]

Hi @PeterKvayt,

Thanks for your PR to fix #18335, where you are making the FileUploadPropertyEditor more flexible.

One of the Core Collaborators team will review this as soon as possible - it also seems like one that we want HQ to review, so I'll contact them about it.

Best wishes

Emma

[emmagarland]

Hi @PeterKvayt

I've chatted with HQ and we'll continue the discussion on your features & ideas post, #18335.

At that point, once a decision has been made, we can decide whether to progress, merge or close this PR.

Thanks again for your work

Emma

[AndyButland]

Hi @PeterKvayt - I've been looking this afternoon to see if we could get this in for Umbraco 16. Unfortunately I had trouble re-targeting your branch, so took the liberty of recreating in a new one: #18942

Would it be OK to close this, and have you review what I've done just to make sure it works for your use case before we merge it in please? Happy also if you prefer to create your own new PR, but taken from and targeting v16/dev. Whichever you prefer. Thanks for the contribution and sorry it's taken a few weeks to progress it.

[PeterKvayt]

Yes, we can close this pr due 18942